To Give Training More Impact, Work on Retention


         Subscribe in NewsGator Online   Subscribe in Bloglines
Man preparing food

In the first part of this interview, we spoke to Terrence Donahue, vice president of instructor quality for the National Restaurant Association Educational Foundation (NRAEF). He's the one responsible for supporting the extensive network of registered ServSafe instructors and exam proctors that have awarded over three million ServeSafe Food Protection Manager certifications. In that column (March issue, page 88), Donahue explored some of the ways NRAEF has sought to improve the effectiveness of its programs and suggested ways managers could better prepare staff in advance of training so they will get more out of it.

In this second part of the intervew, Donahue offers suggestions for how managers can follow up with employees after training has been completed. We also asked him to provide some tips for improving employee retention of what they have learned and for encouraging better application of that knowledge in the work environment.

When learners return to the workplace, what should the manager or director do to ensure that the training sticks?

Donahue: The manager should immediately schedule specific tasks for them to do that are related to the training they received. This is a very important component of the training process and is key to ensuring that the knowledge and skills are effectively transferred. It is simply a “use it or lose it” proposition.

Let's say you are sending a lead cook out for food safety training. You as a manager would want to conduct a pre-training briefing. This might only take a few minutes, but what a great investment of your time!

It is your chance to communicate what the training is, why that person has been selected to receive it, the kind of knowledge and skills it will provide him or her with, and most importantly, what you will expect from that person when they return from training.

Taking food out

In training our trainers, an analogy I like to use is that there are three types of people who attend training programs: Prisoners, Vacationers and Explorers.

You know who the prisoners are — the 10-year employees who are wondering, “Why am I here?” They are just told to show up and they are unhappy about being there. You've got vacationers. These are people who are glad to be anywhere but at work. They're easy to recognize, too.

Then you have the explorers. These are the people who are excited to be in the class and about taking the knowlege they will gain and applying it to be more successful on the job.

The reason I share this is that if a manager takes the five minutes required to conduct a pre-training briefing with each prospective learner, he or she has the chance to convert some of those vacationers and prisoners into explorers before they get to the training room. As a manager, you have much more power to do this than the trainer does.

When an employee returns from food safety training, what else can a foodservice director or manager do to improve retention?

Donahue: Just as a manager should conduct a pre-training briefing of the employee, laying out the expectations you will have for that person as a result of training, he or she should also conduct a post-training briefing.

You can do this individually or in groups, depending on the situation. Review the objectives of the program. Explore what the employees learned and how they think they will apply what they've learned. Get them to be specific: when and how? See if they can point to aspects of your operation where practices or processes can be improved.

One of the best things you can do is to have them teach what they've learned to others. Have them conduct a session with their peers where they share the knowledge they are bringing back to the organization. NRAEF has some handouts for national Food Safety Education Month that managers can download for free that will help with this (see sidebar).

If you do this, you should provide careful oversight to ensure that the concepts have been correctly grasped and are being directly communicated.

What kinds of things should a director keep in mind when evaluating instructional posters and signage?

Donahue: Two criteria for any instructional material are that it has to be instructionally effective and cost effective. Also, you want signage that can support your goals in multiple ways. It should be more than just a reminder of best practices.

If a task is fairly infrequent, but important, you want to post a job aid or chart that serves as a ready reference. You'll want to ensure that they know you don't expect them to memorize the material, but that they are expected to refer to it and use it as the information is needed.

Tools like this are used to help ensure consistency in performance. You have a consistent standard that is posted, and staff are trained to comply with that standard and have their performance measured against that standard.

How would that work in practice?

Donahue: Think about signage as a performance measurement tool, a feedback mechanism, a how-to reference. Use it to define a standard, something you can train toward, measure performance against, help you provide meaningful feedback to the employee about how well they are doing and how they can improve.

For example, the same list that is a reference poster can also become a checklist that is used during an evaluation, so the employee sees that each step is being checked off and is part of a measurement standard.

Here's another example: say a trainer is in the kitchen conducting a demonstration. He or she will be doing that in a series of four stages: telling, showing, doing, reviewing.

Now consider how the wall chart fits in. First you tell them how to follow the steps on the wall chart. Then you demonstrate how they are done. Then you have an employee perform the steps. Finally, you review the process after the fact, using the wall chart as a checklist. Most learn best by doing, as opposed to seeing or hearing.

What are some of the things to watch out for when training is delegated to others?

Donahue: It is not uncommon to find that in such situations, even a senior employee will present the information this way: “The official way you are supposed to do a task is like this, but let me show you a couple of shortcuts.” If consistent performance is important, as it is in food safety practice, there is no place for shortcuts.

Food safety gets talked about so much, that staff sometimes becomes numb to the topic. How does one prevent that?

Donahue: The best approach is to always look for fresh, creative ways to communicate the importance of food handling practices. I'm sure you've heard the expression — “If the only tool you have is a hammer, everything starts to look like a nail.” If you keep pounding and pounding the same way, everyone will become numb to the blows.

The solution is to make sure you have more than one tool at your disposal. Using different items as props can often help, depending on the nature of the group. Recently I observed a class in which one trainer used different animal Beanie Babies to help a group associate different temperature ranges and cooking requirements with different types of proteins.

Graphic association is a very effective way to emphasize an idea. You might use a photo or drawing of raw chicken being stored on a top shelf with some dripping occuring, and overlay that with a large red “X” through the image. You could follow that with a photo of properly stored product with a large green check mark through the image.

Another technique is to use a “Spot the Error” exercise. For example, if you were doing some pre-shift training, you might take staff into a cooler where you have intentionally misplaced some items to violate standards and then have them find and correct the errors. Does everyone know that it is bad practice to store a mop standing in a bucket rather than hanging it up? If not, it is an opportunity to explain that some common insects like to hide in wet mops.

You have just announced a series of enhancements to the ServSafe Instructor and Proctor programs. How can our readers find out more about these changes?

Donahue: To learn more, go to www.servsafe.com/irc/service/index.asp.

For more information

Here are some additional resources from the NRAEF that can help you with food safety training:

Want to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2008 Penton Media Inc.

In This Issue - August 2008

Features
- Top 10 Growth Chains 2008

Editorial
- Handling Tips and Crisis Situations

Rising Stars
- Steven Greene

Fridge Raid
- For This Chef, Cleveland Rocks

Observer
-Sushi? Sure.

Master Mixologist
- Audrey Saunders

Newsletter

Swing into Restaurant Hospitality’s bi-monthly eNewsletter. Subscribe Now!

Industry Events

August

August 23-25, 2008
Western Foodservice & Hospitality Expo
Sponsored By: Western Foodservice & Hospitality Expo

September 5-7, 2008
Florida Restaurant & Lodging Show
Sponsored By: Florida Restaurant & Lodging Show

More Events

Back to Top

Browse Back Issues

  • August 2008 Cover
  • July 2008
  • June 2008 Cover
  • May 2008
  • April 2007
  • March 2008 Cover
-->